From 26391848f945173b6fc07c7b7c78a6a2788438e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holden Rohrer <hdawg7797@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:40:04 -0400
Subject: essay edits

---
 jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex')

diff --git a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
index 7dc6a67..0253930 100644
--- a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
+++ b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
@@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ And this method works, focusing on personal style instead of on hiding behind a
 %clutter
 
 All of these issues can be reduced to the one atom of writing: problems. Writing is an analytical process, so the easiest and best way to fit it into my cognition is to recognize it as what it is: a big problem that can be broken down into smaller problems. This also allows active learning to be recognized as practice. ``Whatever it is, it has to be confronted and solved'' \zincite{49}. But therein lies the utility of recognizing problems. %does this fit my style?
-They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself.
+They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself. %conclusion doesn't leave people thinking
+%Problems. Maybe this can become a body paragraph, or put this theme more into other paragraphs?
+
 %Make statements of qualities clearer
 
 \biblio
-- 
cgit 

