From 632638431273901dfd25ce65d5ebbd6294575a80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Holden Rohrer Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:30:46 -0400 Subject: did the 10/19 question for INTA --- rich/26_question | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) create mode 100644 rich/26_question diff --git a/rich/26_question b/rich/26_question new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61a87fd --- /dev/null +++ b/rich/26_question @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +Which of the 7 criteria for Case Selection presented in the lecture +should guarantee access to the Supreme Court and why? No more than 2--3 +sentences. + +Two cases should guarantee access to the Supreme Court: a state Supreme +Court invalidating a federal law and the Solicitor General requesting +review. A state Supreme Court's invalidation should be handled +immediately in order to avoid precedents that vary the rights of +citizens of different states. The Solicitor General's request is a less +pressing motivation, but so as to avoid extreme political bias in the +Court's docket, the executive should be able to exert this power on the +Court, forcing it to at least take a stance on certain issues. -- cgit