When is a federal system the best? - Unitary = uniform policies with all the same laws and regulations - Federal = represent states, heterogenous policies - Federal = more flexible, for individual rights and businesses - Ex: midwesterners care about farming - Hyperlocality vs large urban centers (service industries) - Unitary = high regulation of large corporations and industries - Also social regulation - Federal = higher cultural diversity - Unitary systems struggle with incorporating diversity - Assimilation, single/little-varying political culture A federal system is best when you - Care less about efficiency of governance - Have a more heterogenous population - Need to let interest groups and subnationals represent Legislature - Judicial, executive enforce - Legislature represents "nation-state as a whole" - Make laws - Classifying legislatures 1) How is the executive chosen? Parliamentary = Prime Minister comes out of legislature Presidential = people vote for the president - Different constituencies - PM responsible to parties/lawmakers - President responsible to the people - In the US system, their powers are independent - Studied as separate institutions, unlike parliament 2) How many chambers? - Bicameral or Unicameral Unicameral = legislation is fast Bicameral = legislation is slow Bicameral = responsibility for laws is less clear - Confounding of power - Senate is more powerful, but not perceived as such Unicameral = more of a broad responsibility to the country - Good society Bicameral = responsibility to constituents, parties, interests - "Specific" - Voter loyalty to party, districts, representatives - Very little insulation from public opinion, esp. localness Cost: $bicameral > $unicameral 3) Full vs part time legislators - Georgia senators only work 40 days - Maybe more subject to corruption, less diligence - Care less about the job - US senators full time