From 8dafd8aec819e85fd36cbd1d6231aad24e62c31b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Holden Rohrer Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:21:57 -0400 Subject: Finished work from last semester --- stanzione/mm3.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'stanzione/mm3.tex') diff --git a/stanzione/mm3.tex b/stanzione/mm3.tex index 733e178..fceb7d9 100644 --- a/stanzione/mm3.tex +++ b/stanzione/mm3.tex @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Your friend gets a rude and distant experimenter, and they also eat three grasshoppers. A lot of people expect that after this experiment, you would like the grasshoppers more than your friend, but we actually see the opposite -effect \autocite[433]{textbook}! +effect \autocite{textbook}! You have the explanation ``I did it to please the nice experimenter'' for why you ate the grasshoppers. But your friend has to rationalize why they ate the grasshoppers, so @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ they are more likely to rationalize that they liked the taste. This affect is called an ``attitude,'' a composite of the actions, feelings, and ideas you have on a topic, and cognitive dissonance usually brings these components into line with each other -\autocite[431]{textbook}. +\autocite{textbook}. \begin{figure}[ht] \begin{center} -- cgit