From 8dafd8aec819e85fd36cbd1d6231aad24e62c31b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holden Rohrer
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:21:57 -0400
Subject: Finished work from last semester
---
stanzione/mm3.tex | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'stanzione/mm3.tex')
diff --git a/stanzione/mm3.tex b/stanzione/mm3.tex
index 733e178..fceb7d9 100644
--- a/stanzione/mm3.tex
+++ b/stanzione/mm3.tex
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Your friend gets a rude and distant experimenter, and they also eat
three grasshoppers.
A lot of people expect that after this experiment, you would like the
grasshoppers more than your friend, but we actually see the opposite
-effect \autocite[433]{textbook}!
+effect \autocite{textbook}!
You have the explanation ``I did it to please the nice experimenter''
for why you ate the grasshoppers.
But your friend has to rationalize why they ate the grasshoppers, so
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ they are more likely to rationalize that they liked the taste.
This affect is called an ``attitude,'' a composite of the actions,
feelings, and ideas you have on a topic, and cognitive dissonance
usually brings these components into line with each other
-\autocite[431]{textbook}.
+\autocite{textbook}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}
--
cgit