From 8dafd8aec819e85fd36cbd1d6231aad24e62c31b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Holden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:21:57 -0400
Subject: Finished work from last semester

---
 stanzione/mm3.tex | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'stanzione/mm3.tex')

diff --git a/stanzione/mm3.tex b/stanzione/mm3.tex
index 733e178..fceb7d9 100644
--- a/stanzione/mm3.tex
+++ b/stanzione/mm3.tex
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Your friend gets a rude and distant experimenter, and they also eat
 three grasshoppers.
 A lot of people expect that after this experiment, you would like the
 grasshoppers more than your friend, but we actually see the opposite
-effect \autocite[433]{textbook}!
+effect \autocite{textbook}!
 You have the explanation ``I did it to please the nice experimenter''
 for why you ate the grasshoppers.
 But your friend has to rationalize why they ate the grasshoppers, so
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ they are more likely to rationalize that they liked the taste.
 This affect is called an ``attitude,'' a composite of the actions,
 feelings, and ideas you have on a topic, and cognitive dissonance
 usually brings these components into line with each other
-\autocite[431]{textbook}.
+\autocite{textbook}.
 
 \begin{figure}[ht]
     \begin{center}
-- 
cgit 

