\def\bmatrix#1{\left[\matrix{#1}\right]} {\bf\noindent Section 1.6} {\bf\noindent 4.} {\it (a)} That means $A^{-1}$ exists s.t. $A^{-1}A = I.$ $$AB = AC \to A^{-1}AB = A^{-1}AC \to B = C$$ {\it (b)} $$B = \pmatrix{1 & 1\cr 1 & 0}$$ $$C = \pmatrix{1 & 2\cr 1 & 1}$$ $$AB = AC.$$ % double check {\bf\noindent 10.} $$A_1^{-1} = \bmatrix{0 & 0 & 0 & 1\cr 0 & 0 & 1/2 & 0\cr 0 & 1/3 & 0 & 0\cr 1/4 & 0 & 0 & 0}$$ $$A_2^{-1} = \bmatrix{1 & 0 & 0 & 0\cr 1/2 & 1 & 0 & 0\cr 0 & 2/3 & 1 & 0\cr 0 & 0 & 3/4 & 1}$$ \def\rowone{{d\over ad-bc}&{-b\over ad-bc}} \def\rowtwo{{-c\over ad-bc}&{a\over ad-bc}} $$A_3^{-1} = \bmatrix{\rowone & 0 & 0\cr \rowtwo & 0 & 0\cr 0 & 0 & \rowone \cr 0 & 0 & \rowtwo}$$ {\bf\noindent 11.} If $A = I$ and $B = -I,$ both are invertible, but $A + B$ is not. If $A = \pmatrix{1&0\cr 0&0}$ and $B = \pmatrix{0&0\cr 0&1},$ $A + B = I$ is invertible, but neither $A$ nor $B$ are. $A = B = I$ gives $A + B,$ $A,$ and $B$ invertibility. $A^{-1} = B^{-1} = I \to A^{-1}(A+B)B^{-1} = B^{-1} + A^{-1} \to 2I = 2I.$ {\bf\noindent 12.} {\it (a)} This one remains. {\it (b)} This one remains. {\it (c)} This one remains. {\it (d)} This one doesn't remain. {\it (e)} This one remains. % I don't really have any coherent reasons for this. % But these all make a lot of sense to me. % This isn't graded, but I would like to understand it better. Office % hours? {\bf\noindent 23.} $$\bmatrix{10&20\cr 20&50}\bmatrix{x\cr y} = \bmatrix{1\cr 0} \to \bmatrix{10&20\cr 0&10}\bmatrix{x \cr y} = \bmatrix{1\cr -2}$$$$\to \bmatrix{1&2\cr 0&1}\bmatrix{x \cr y} = \bmatrix{1/10\cr -2/10} \to \bmatrix{1&0\cr 0&1}\bmatrix{x \cr y} = \bmatrix{5/10\cr -2/10}. $$ $$\bmatrix{10&20\cr 20&50}\bmatrix{x\cr y} = \bmatrix{0\cr 1} \to \bmatrix{1&2\cr 0&1}\bmatrix{x\cr y} = \bmatrix{0\cr 1/10} \to \bmatrix{1&0\cr 0&1}\bmatrix{x\cr y} = \bmatrix{-2/10\cr 1/10}. $$ $$A^{-1} = {1\over10}\bmatrix{5&-2\cr -2&1}$$ {\bf\noindent 25.} {\it (a)} $$\bmatrix{\hbox{row 1}\cr\hbox{row 2}\cr\hbox{row 1 + row 2}}\bmatrix{x\cr y\cr z} = \bmatrix{1\cr0\cr0} \to \bmatrix{\hbox{row 1}\cr\hbox{row 2}\cr0}\bmatrix{x\cr y\cr z} = \bmatrix{1\cr0\cr-1}.$$ $0 \neq -1,$ so this is inconsistent. {\it (b)} If $b_3 = b_2 + b_1,$ this matrix admits a solution. {\it (c)} As already shown, row 3 becomes a zero row during elimination. {\bf\noindent 27.} $B = E_12A,$ and the elementary matrix which switches the first two rows is by definition invertible ($E_12E_12 = I$) so if $A$ is invertible, $B$ is also invertible, and $B^{-1} = A^{-1}E_12$ (I think this is a switch of columns). {\bf\noindent 36.} $$\bmatrix{2 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\cr 1 & 2 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0\cr 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 1} \to \bmatrix{2 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\cr 0 & 1.5 & 1 & .5 & 1 & 0\cr 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 1} \to \bmatrix{2 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0\cr 0 & 1 & 0 & .5 & 1 & .5\cr 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 1} $$$$\to \bmatrix{2 & 0 & 0 & .5 & -1 & -.5\cr 0 & 1 & 0 & .5 & 1 & .5\cr 0 & 1 & 2 & 0 & 0 & 1} \to \bmatrix{2 & 0 & 0 & .5 & -1 & -.5\cr 0 & 1 & 0 & .5 & 1 & .5\cr 0 & 0 & 2 & -.5 & -1 & .5} $$ Inverse is $$ \bmatrix{.25 & -.5 & -.25\cr .5 & 1 & .5\cr -.25 & -.5 & .25} $$ % {\bf\noindent 40.} {\bf\noindent Section 2.1} {\bf\noindent 2.} {\it (a)} This is. $k(0, b_2, b_3) = (0, kb_2, kb_3),$ and similar for addition. {\it (b)} This isn't. $2(0, 1, 0) = (0, 2, 0),$ which isn't in the subset. {\it (c)} This isn't. $(1, 1, 0) + (1, 0, 1) = (2, 1, 1),$ which isn't in the subset, even though its two starting components are. {\it (d)} This is, by definition. {\it (e)} Yes, this is the null space of a homogenous matrix with one row. It is a subspace. {\bf\noindent 7.} {\it (a)} This is not a subspace. The given sequence plus the given sequence with a zero prepended would sum to a sequence without a zero, meaning it is not closed under addition. {\it (b)} This is a subspace because the sums and multiples are closed. {\it (c)} $x_{j+1} \leq x_j \land y_{j+1} \leq y_j \to x_{j+1} + y_{j+1} \leq x_j + y_j,$ and similar for multiplication. {\it (d)} Yes, the sum of two convergent sequences will tend to the sum of their limits, and each can be multiplied by a real. {\it (e)} Yes, the sum of two arithmetic series will be an arithmetic series, and they work with multiplications by a real. {\it (f)} This isn't because $x_1 = 1,$ $k = 2,$ and $x_1 = 1,$ $k = 3$ sum to $$2 + 5 + 14 + \cdots,$$ which is not a geometric sequence. {\bf\noindent 8.} % required The two rows are linearly independent, so with 3 unknows, this forms a line (intersection of two equations/planes). {\bf\noindent 18.} {\it (a)} It's probably a line, but it could be a plane. {\it (b)} It's probably $(0, 0, 0)$, but it could be a line. % {\it (c)} % I don't know. {\bf\noindent 22.} % required {\it (a)} This matrix has a column space with basis $(1, 2, -1)^T,$ so it is only solvable if $b = (b_1, b_2, b_3)^T$ is a multiple of that vector. {\it (b)} These two columns are linearly independent, so any b within the span of them has a solution. {\bf\noindent 25.} Unless $b$ is in the span of $A.$ If A is the zero $3\times 1$ matrix, and $b$ is the first column of $I_3,$ then the column space increases. If $A = b,$ then it would not extend the column space. Iff $b$ is already in the column space, then $Ax = b$ has a solution. {\bf\noindent 26.} They are not equal only if $B$ is not invertible (it is a necessary but not sufficient condition). If $A$ is invertible, like $A = I,$ then non-invertible $B$ gives $AB = B$ with smaller column space. {\bf\noindent 28.} % required {\it (a)} False. Counterexample: The complement of $(0, 0, 0)$ does not pass the test $0v \in V.$ {\it (b)} True. The space with only the zero vector has a basis of only zero vectors. {\it (c)} True. Each of $2A$'s columns can be transformed into the columns of $A$ by division by 2. {\it (d)} False. The column space of $-I$ is the full space, unlike the zero matrix it's ``based on.'' {\bf\noindent 30.} % required $${\bf C}(A) = {\bf R}^9.$$ \bye