Through the experiment several things were noted that could have improved the efficiency of the procedure and became a challenge, for example keeping track of the antlions became challenging as the experiment progressed, especially in the later trials when some of the antlions began to hide passively beneath the sand.
Furthermore, removing the antlions from the enclosure after each trial became tedious, as it was difficult to find antlions that were under the sand or evaded capture.
However,  the setup and introductory periods both went well with each trial, as no major issues arose when setting the trials or when introducing the antlions.
It was also noted that depth and width of the pits were smaller in trials with smaller enclosures and that antlions had roughly the same density across all sizes because they would become ‘dormant’ if sufficient area was not readily available, both of which could be due to increased  interaction between antlions within smaller enclosures.
Measurement of the antlions' pits also  became difficult, especially as the pits decreased in size (namely in the $<$1cm range), because parallax and `bumping' of the pits could introduce error.
Lastly, cannibalism and death occurred at a relatively constant rate across all trials, indicating that cannibalism was more a function of time than a result of overcrowding.
