\let\liskip\medskip Antlions organize themselves systematically in response to the environments where they find themselves. Individuals attempt to regularize their own pit locations according to nearby pits and the borders of the living space, and this structure is affirmed by a statistical test on the uniformity of their distribution. Using a Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 randomly distributed patterns of the same number of pits as observed from each trial, a typical distribution of the distance to the nearest neighbor was determined. The distance to the nearest neighbor is approximately independent for each pit, so a Cram\'er-von Mises statistical test was applied to the observed distributions, resulting in striking evidence that these pit %' distributions do not conform to a uniformly random independent distribution of each pit, with all (except one) distributions of antlions having $p<0.05.$ \liskip \li As a result of the statistical analysis procedure, during which the settlement patterns of antlions in a given trial were compared to a completely random settlement, a clear correlation was shown between the settlement patterns of the antlions and environmental constraints. \li A clear increase in the reclusive population as trial size decreased was observed in every obstacle condition, as the reclusive population increased from one ($24\times24$) to two ($12\times12$) during the trail erasure trial. The same results are shown across the trial with fake pits, where the number of reclusive antlions increased from one to four, and the obstacle trial, where the amount of reclusive antlion increased from zero to three. \li The number of reclusive antlions increased by an average of 2.333 antlions, or an increase of 233.3\%, which marks quite a significant change. \liskip This change indicates that the introduction of various obstacles and interference in other modes of communication can change the natural settlement patterns of the antlions, as a significantly larger number of reclusive antlions were observed during trials with artificial pits, indicating that the density of pits in a given area affects how antlions settle the territory. This analysis makes biological sense, as by regulating the density of antlions in a given territory the organisms can reduce intraspecific competition, which in turn helps the species reproduce more as a whole, thereby explaining the phenomenon. Along with this, a dramatic change in the cannibalistic nature of the antlions was noticed once various obstacles were introduced, for example. \liskip \li It was noted in the previous study that the number of cannibalized antlions increased by an average of 13.9785\% when the trial size was reduced with no obstacles or communication interference. \li This differs from the trend in cannibalism noted throughout the following trials, as the data clearly shows how the rate of cannibalism tended to decrease across various trials. \liskip This indicates that the antlions' cannibalistic nature is affected by environmental conditions such as changes in terrain and other obstacles, which could be a response to an interrupted communication pattern that results in a closer settlement, which intern would increase the contact between each antlion, thereby leading to more cannibalism. Finally, along with a trend in reclusivity and cannibalism, a trend was noticed in the average pit depth across all trials, as it decreased as trial size decreased throughout the study, regardless of the obstacles introduced (\boxplotref). This indicates that the size of pits made by antlions is independent of the mechanisms that govern how they settle, as the study was able to alter all of the settlement patterns of the antlions through the introduction of obstacles except for the average pit depth, which maintained a constant pattern through the introduction of obstacles and the original trial from a previous year. This indicates that the average pit depth does not depend on their settlement pattern of the antlion community as a whole, but rather is dependent on factors such as time and available resources. Several patterns were also observed in whole antlion group distributions. \liskip \li The average nearest neighbor remained relatively constant across all trials and environmental conditions, except for when a series of fake pits were introduced to the environment, as the average nearest neighbor ranged from 2.1-3.9 (\lineplotref) for all trials except the $24\times24$ trial with fake pits, where the average nearest neighbor increased to 8.7. \li The nearest neighbor, in the fake pits trial, decreased by about 5.5 inches, which differed from the trail erasure where the nearest neighbor decreased by about 1.95 inches, and the trial where obstacles were introduced, during which nearest neighbor remains constant. \li The antlions maintain a non-random distribution pattern across all trial sizes and environmental conditions, as the antlions near the middle of the habitat maintain equidistance from their neighbors, a principle that is evidenced by the centermost pit in each Voronoi diagram. \li Voronoi diagrams may also show how the antlions tend to maintain semi-constant territory size across both changes in environment and changes in habitat size, as the average territory occupied by each antlion does not change significantly past a certain maximum density of pits. This strategy reduces cannibalism and competition. \liskip Based on the settlement patterns of the antlions on both, an individual and group scale several conclusions can be drawn about the environment's impact on the settlement patterns of the insect along with the mechanisms that antlions use to settle in a non-random pattern. \liskip \li One of the most interesting patterns in the data was the impact of fake pits on the antlions settlement, as when fake pits were introduced to the environment the rate of cannibalism and reclusivity among the antlion population increased significantly, as shown by \boxplotref. \li Antlions tended to space themselves away from fake pits when settling, represented by an abnormally high nearest neighbor metric (between real pits) during this trial, as shown by \boxplotref. \li This indicates that the settlement pattern of the antlions is highly dependent on the existence of pits around them because the fake pits trial showed that raised ground and deformities in the environment allow antlions to decide on their nesting location. \li This may indicate, in part, mechanical rather than cognitive nesting mechanisms. \li Along with this the increase in reclusivity and cannibalism observed during this trial also indicates that antlions, as individuals, attempt to reduce the surface density of pits through extreme behavior. \liskip