The materials were first purchased. 24 16oz deli containers were filled with 2.5 inches of play sand and one antlion was placed in each container. Every week, each plastic container (i.e. each antlion pit) was given a small cricket The crickets were purchased from a pet supply store. The remaining sand (100lbs) was spread into a $24"\times24"$ plastic container at a depth of at least 2 inches. A meter stick and a pen was used to make one-inch separated marks on the vertical and horizontal axes of the box so the antlions' pits' locations could be observed. Using the grid, each trial was started by distributing a group of antlions in an array shape (the dimensions and populations of which are in a table below), and equally spaced between eachother and the walls, all inserted around the same time. %%% Need to make that table Antlions were transferred between the small containers and the experimental environment by scooping them with a plastic spoon and sifting the sand from the antlion with a sieve. After the first and second days of each two-day trial, the coordinate locations, diameters, and depths of each antlion pit were recorded for later analysis. After each trial, all living antlions were restored to their pits and dead antlions disposed of. Further trials repeated these same protocols except with modified space restrictions and several methods to disrupt potential communication pathways. Each disruption method was trialled with each space restriction, each trial run over a two day period. There are three different space restrictions and three different disruption methods. The space restrictions are $24"\times24"$ (the initial box size), $16"\times16"$, and $12"\times12"$ (constructed in the original container by cardboard and duct tape barriers). The three disruption methods are ``trail erasure,'' ``fake pits,'' and ``artificial obstacles,'' making for nine trials in total. ``Trail erasure'' will be, once a day, brushing away old trails in the sand which antlions have dug out, in an effort to determine if the reduction of this possible communication pathway will destabilize or change the pit distribution. ``Fake pits'' will be sand scooped out in an inverse cone to mimic an antlion pit, with two or three placed uniformly randomly once a day, except when it would sit on top of an existing pit. This will show if the antlions are intelligently avoiding pits or if cannibalism creates the patterns that are observed in their distribution. ``Artificial obstacles'' are small stones or hard plastic barriers with a minimum height of .5in above the sand to determine if antlions are aware of the shape of their settlement region and use that to organize the group.