aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--PROGRESS6
-rw-r--r--rich/30_voters31
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/PROGRESS b/PROGRESS
index e6e90a2..191833c 100644
--- a/PROGRESS
+++ b/PROGRESS
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
-- INTA lecture 11/2
- INTA lecture 11/4
- INTA lecture 11/6
- INTA lecture 11/9
- INTA lecture 11/11
+- INTA lecture 11/13
- Nixon lecture
-- USH quiz 5
+- Seventies lecture
- Revision activity on RR#3
- RR#4
- Med journal project
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
- Determine what portfolio covers
- Math Club Planning
- DNA Club Outreach
++ INTA lecture 11/2
++ USH quiz 5
+ Math 6
+ Math 7
+ 1960s lecture
diff --git a/rich/30_voters b/rich/30_voters
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..36329a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rich/30_voters
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+How do voters choose their candidates?
+- Psychologically:
+ - Party identification
+ - Some people vote Dem every year
+ - Some people vote Rep every year
+ - Some people say they're Independent but are on party lines
+ - Perception of the candidate
+ - Hate/love a candidate; actually turn out because to vote for
+ or sometimes against.
+ - Issue Preference (most rational choice, less common)
+ - Esp. in this election, perceptions can override voters who
+ usually vote this way when the candidate is polarizing
+ - Works best for very ideologically focused candidates.
+V.O. Key on why voters vote how they do
+ - Victory is "Voice of the people is an echo"
+ - Voters say/represent what you want to hear.
+ - "Voters are not fools." They are "rationally and
+ responsibly...moved by concern about central and relevant
+ questions."
+ - Argues that, in the US at least, *everyone* is an issue preference
+ voter.
+But, for ex., the Exit Polls in 2004 actually had Terrorism/Iraq as a
+swing issue between Bush and Kerry.
+This is an obviously irrational central issue, because those that ranked
+lower, healthcare, education, taxes, affect far more people.
+
+- Because elections are so expensive, often electability is more
+ important than fitness.
+- Does high turnout really make a healthy democracy?
+- Well, democracies are sometimes made more healthy by intangible
+ freedoms like of the press, speech, assembly.