aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--markley/portfolio/01_first_week_video.html81
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/markley/portfolio/01_first_week_video.html b/markley/portfolio/01_first_week_video.html
index 197ef39..379c8e3 100644
--- a/markley/portfolio/01_first_week_video.html
+++ b/markley/portfolio/01_first_week_video.html
@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
-<h4>Introduction:&nbsp;</h4>
-<p>This video is an introduction, describing a handful of superficial
-details about me, the general topic of the course, and where,
-specifically, I expect to struggle in this course.
+<h4>Introduction:</h4>
+<p>This video is a short (1m30s) personal introduction and a discussion
+of which element of WOVEN I expect to struggle most with in this course.
I expect to struggle with visual communication more than the other
-forms, which will manifest in several places, but will probably have the
+forms, which will manifest in several places but will probably have the
most significant effects on videos or the blog design.
This video also includes how I plan to develop my skills with this
modality (I plan to focus on design and aesthetics of presentation).</p>
@@ -11,9 +10,77 @@ modality (I plan to focus on design and aesthetics of presentation).</p>
allowfullscreen="" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<dl>
<dd>Goals</dd>
- <dt>This assignment </dt>
+ <dt>Through this assignment, I familiarized myself with the
+ WOVEN elements and set a goal for self-improvement throughout
+ the course. I also worked on video production and presentation,
+ to practice some of these elements. I expect to target this in
+ assignments throughout the course. I also better understand the
+ value of targeting multiple types of communication for rhetoric
+ and in different works. This assignment was also directed
+ towards the course material, and I better understand the
+ assignments that we will be doing throughout the course (like
+ the reading journal or final video project) because I will
+ probably want to put extra effort into using the visual and
+ design aspect of my content effectively. The reading journal,
+ especially, will benefit from extra design work.</dt>
<dd>Purpose/Prompt</dd>
+ <dt>This video includes a short introduction to me, including my
+ name, "major," and hometown and the theme of this course (health
+ as a social construct) and the teacher (Dr. Markley). The
+ First-Week Video asks about a potential struggle with WOVEN
+ based on previous experience with trying to communicate in the
+ medium. In addition to previous experience with the medium, the
+ assignment asked me to develop a goal and a way to reach that
+ goal based on that previous experience. I did this by talking
+ about a focus on revision and the specific component of graphic
+ design, but I didn't match these with previous experience. I
+ could have talked about better, simpler presentations I've made
+ on topics I've known more about, where I can tell most of the
+ story and the graphics were improved through a couple of rounds
+ of revision, based on the content.</dt>
<dd>Audience</dd>
+ <dt>The audience is faculty members and other first-year
+ students who are familiar with WOVEN, this assignment, and the
+ objectives of the course in general, like rhetoric. Because of
+ this familiarity with the objective, I explicitly connected the
+ visual mode to my difficulty with speaking briefly, but I tried
+ not to overexplain the mode or visual design. However, I did
+ give my personal experience of how the need for brevity and
+ dense language collide. PowerPoints and posters are my most
+ common interactions with the visual mode, and my audience should
+ be familiar with both. However, I barely included one anecdotal
+ example under the time constraints, possibly because I explained
+ too abstractly: I could have talked about a revision or the
+ impact of a poor design and better shown my point about brevity
+ and still had time to talk about the digital reading journal.
+ </dt>
<dd>Design for Medium</dd>
- <dd>Revision</dd>
+ <dt>Because this is a video, I focused on engagement. For
+ content, I wrote out a script that I would read, rehearse, and
+ edit down into. I used a high-jumpcut vlog style to make the
+ video seem more energetic, and I tried to keep my voice upbeat
+ because my voice is the primary content in this style. I chose
+ not to use another production style like a time-lapse or
+ slideshow because I think my image and a direct explanation of
+ my ideas is important and best delivered talking straight to the
+ camera. I included music (the instrumental of White Town's Your
+ Woman) because I think that it better covers up breaks in
+ talking and maintains a central element throughout the video. I
+ did try to keep it quiet relative to me talking because the
+ music itself is unimportant.</dt>
+ <dd>Revision</dd><!--The most important question-->
+ <dt>Another type of video may have fit my argument better, but
+ given the style I chose, the video could have been improved on
+ the script and on the presentation. The script could have
+ been much more personal by extending the anecdote and possibly
+ including a visual representation for the product I created. I
+ also probably should have chosen music not under copyright, and
+ possibly faded it out at the beginning and in at the end. For
+ the final product, cutting away to an image might have made it
+ more engaging. The way I filmed it could also be improved: I
+ held the camera, so it shook a bit, and I read the script for
+ part of the video. If I had mostly memorized the script and
+ propped up the camera to get a single shot between cuts and
+ to stabilize it, the video would probably feel higher quality.
+ </dt>
</dl>