diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'rosbruck')
-rw-r--r-- | rosbruck/hostility.png | bin | 0 -> 44266 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | rosbruck/jung.png | bin | 0 -> 61131 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | rosbruck/surveys.tex | 130 |
3 files changed, 130 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rosbruck/hostility.png b/rosbruck/hostility.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..01ab11b --- /dev/null +++ b/rosbruck/hostility.png diff --git a/rosbruck/jung.png b/rosbruck/jung.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..90d44d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/rosbruck/jung.png diff --git a/rosbruck/surveys.tex b/rosbruck/surveys.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd58cb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/rosbruck/surveys.tex @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +\input color +\catcode`@=11 +\font\twelverm=ptmr7t at 12pt +\def\rm{\fam\z@\twelverm} +\font\twelvebf=ptmb7t at 12pt +\def\bf{\fam\bffam\twelvebf} +\catcode`@=12 +\rm +\baselineskip=16pt + +\centerline{\bf Personality Surveys/Scales Results Sheet} + +{\bf Class Section:} B\par +{\bf Name (Last, First):} Holden Rohrer\par +{\bf GTID:} 903466338 +\bigskip + +{\bf\item{1.} Jung Typology Test (Myers-Briggs Indicator)} + +\smallskip +\pdfximage width 4in{jung.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage + +\iffalse +\centerline{\color{red} ENFP} +Extravert(41\%) iNtuitive(38\%) Feeling(41\%) Perceiving(31\%) + +\item{$\bullet$} You have moderate preference of Extraversion over +Introversion (41\%) +\item{$\bullet$} You have moderate preference of Intuition over Sensing +(38\%) +\item{$\bullet$} You have moderate preference of Feeling over Thinking +(41\%) +\item{$\bullet$} You have moderate preference of Perceiving over Judging +(31\%) +\fi + +\bigskip +{\bf\item{2.} Locus of Control (LOC) Survey (Julian Rotter)} + +18/23 + +\bigskip +{\bf\item{3.} Satisfaction with Life Survey} + +34/35 + +\bigskip +{\bf\item{4.} Hostility/Anger Scale} + +\smallskip +\pdfximage width 4in{hostility.png}\pdfrefximage\pdflastximage + +\bigskip +\vskip0pt plus 1in\goodbreak\vskip0pt plus -1in +{\bf\item{5.} Summary} (1--2 pages single spaced, Times New Roman, size +12, black font) +\medskip\penalty200 + +I was not very surprised with these results except by how clearly they +confirmed my existing beliefs about myself. +I consider myself very even-tempered and satisfied, my very low +hostility/anger scale and high satisfaction with life confirmed. + +I've also taken the Myers-Briggs/Jung Typology test before, and last +time I took it, I got ENFP, which is both who I believe I am and who I +want to be, very personable and in-touch with my feelings. +Interestingly, this is a change from results I've gotten in the past, +which were always typically extraverted, but they used to be the more +``analytical, considerate'' type of personality (sensing, thinking, +judging) because I changed my mind about what sort of traits would make +me happier. + +And the highly external locus of control makes a lot of sense with my +socially-oriented politics (Marxism). +I understand how strongly one's environments impact their choices, their +disposition, and their ability to control their environment. +It has also made me deeply sympathetic for other people's choices, which +I think makes me a lot less hostile and more forgiving. + +My satisfaction with life correlates really well with my socio-economic +status and the social desirability of my life plus +non-competitiveness---meaning I can be content with my life and ignore +anything ``negative'' that might happen. + +The main concern I have about these tests is that I'm rating myself more +on my aspirations than accurate self-perception. +Also, I've heard speculation around the inaccuracy and instability of +the Meyers-Briggs test, so I'm personally a bigger fan of OCEAN +(Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and +Neuroticism) traits because they were found to be stable over long +periods of time and more closely respect the fact that personality is a +spectrum instead of 16 tightly-aligned categories. + +These survey results don't give me any desire to improve myself because +I'm already very satisfie with my life and my interpersonal relations. +Probably my most surprising result would be that having an external +locus of control doesn't demotivate me because I still believe that +labor, social striving, and social changes do have power to influence +change. +I just reject the idea of individualist modes of change, and I believe +that rewards aren't automatically going to be justly distributed. +I'm glad that none of these results were surprising because that would +mean I don't know myself very well. +I also disagree with some of the external locus of control questions, +like the one about war. +That question makes more sense with a view of war as the result of a few +people's choices, and doesn't really make sense with a social +interpretation of politics. +However, I still got an accurate approximation of my personality, so I +can't complain. + +My Myers-Briggs results tell me that I like being around people and I +get energized by their presence (extraversion), which isn't very +surprising. +Of course, I can still get drained from meeting too many new people or +having a lot of small talk-y conversations, but I really do like and +look forward to spending time around people I know even moderately well. +I think that I fall into the category of moderately intuitive thinker, +because I don't believe that my own beliefs are founded in any pure +reasoning, and I really like working with theoretical ideas, which is +why I'm considering work in a research or academic field. +I also am very open and agreeable, so the ``perceiving type'' +(preferring freedom and flexibility) makes a lot of sense for my +character, but I'm not opposed to settling down quickly on an idea if +the situation demands it. +I also try to prioritize people and emotions as much as I can over +invalidating people with ``facts and logic,'' since that sort of thought +process is simply rude. + +\bye |