aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHolden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev>2020-11-18 16:01:25 -0500
committerHolden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev>2020-11-18 16:01:37 -0500
commit67f74646b43bf181d10b6d4fdbc9e3721a611dd9 (patch)
treefb22ac80b70c7cb1e67d0c87f6790a7490de4ced
parent5b30719af9c2eb9afbc8d23a763856f7560db196 (diff)
my opinion on interest groups
-rw-r--r--PROGRESS2
-rw-r--r--rich/33_discuss15
2 files changed, 16 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/PROGRESS b/PROGRESS
index 3f9f112..ef2d6d2 100644
--- a/PROGRESS
+++ b/PROGRESS
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-- Discussion activity for INTA
- INTA lecture 11/16
- INTA lecture 11/19
- Nixon lecture
@@ -15,6 +14,7 @@
+ Proposal
- Determine what portfolio covers
- Math Club Planning
++ Discussion activity for INTA
+ DNA Club Outreach
+ INTA lecture 11/13
+ INTA lecture 11/11
diff --git a/rich/33_discuss b/rich/33_discuss
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52566a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rich/33_discuss
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+After listening to lecture, do you believe interest groups are dangerous
+or are they a productive part of the political process in United States?
+
+Interest groups are value-neutral: they are just a way of organizing
+individuals into "factions."
+An environmentalist voter holds a proportional amount of power if they
+donate to political candidates and advocate independently or organize
+with a group.
+The same holds for businesses, farmers, and pro-gun voters.
+However, they are dangerous and though they can't be limited explicitly,
+the government needs to manage the power their constituent groups hold.
+If businesses are consistently pushing for anti-labor policy, the
+government needs to limit the power of businesses.
+Their interest groups should still be maintained as a useful touchpoint
+for the government.