diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'markley/09_dr_moreau')
-rw-r--r-- | markley/09_dr_moreau | 67 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/markley/09_dr_moreau b/markley/09_dr_moreau index 1a3363c..d5a5dc9 100644 --- a/markley/09_dr_moreau +++ b/markley/09_dr_moreau @@ -354,3 +354,70 @@ him---on transit, in the street, everywhere. "This is a mood" Edward is solitary, and still a man of science, investigating chemistry and astronomy. + +-------------- +Lecture + +HG Wells calls his stories "scientific romances." +- Unreliable narrator established by nephew +- Meduesa = real life + - Cannibalism in British imagination + - Thin veneer of civilization + - Sign of Four: Tonga, Andaman (falsely) believed to be cannibal +Norms, regulations, taboos (health) vanish in extreme circumstances. +- Taboos are sometimes derived from medical concerns +- British court case established that necessity is not enough + +Uncanny +- Deliberately vague term to describe the appalling + - Freud: subjective experience reminding its viewer of repressed + memories/experiences/desires + - Wells implements this in Prendick's fear of M'ling, "forgotten + horrors of childhood." + - Playing with the line between animal and human + +The importance of eyes in Dr Moreau +- "Eyes are the window to the soul" + - Bit cliched, but based on perception that personality correlates + - Looking at someone, making eye contact ~ trust +- The eyes that Wells talks about are mistrusting: M'ling's red eyes are + disturbing because they are abnormal and shifty + - The cannibalism implied by hunger in the eyes is also about trust: + there is limited trust between the men on the boat + +Human and animal +- Prendick's humanity is mixed with animals/beastliness + - Falls out of hammock *on all fours* + - Food -> "animal comfort" + - Shows that the line is a bit blurrier: culture, structure falls + back to needs (food, water) that are shared with animals + - After Moreau,Montgomery die, Prendick falls into "monster's ways." +- Prendick believes Moreau to vivisect people. + - Vivisecting men violates the laws of human health. + - But Prendick is actually convinced it's okay because he sees that + Moreau is experimenting on something "inhuman" + - Not cruel, Wells explores this cultural rule + +Vivisection +- Moreau views his (fancy) vivisection experiments as natural scientific + exploration extending standard surgeries +- Moreau wants to eliminate pain, sees it as inhuman and ignores it + - For Prendick, actually makes him realize the humanity of beastfolk + +Degeneration +- Social/biological idea in zeitgeist: fear that evolution doesn't + necessarily increase intelligence, complexity + - Lead humans "back down the evolutionary ladder" + - Corresponds with scientific racism, arguments that urbanization + and modernization collapsed traditional morals, crime, disease. +- Moreau: proto-eugenics +- Prendick's return to the city hints at sort of humanity's instability + +Health +- Uses social/cultural, apersonal definition. +- Criticizes some medical health experiments + - Questions about humanity, sacrifice in context of vivisection + - Questions science +Walter Benjamin: "There is no document of civilization [advancement of +medical science] that is not also a document of barbarism." +- Pay attention to sacrifices made for science |