aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html')
-rw-r--r--markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html102
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html b/markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2dec99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/markley/portfolio/02_first_week_video.html
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+<!--Title: First-Week Video-->
+<h2>Introduction:</h2>
+<p>This video is a short (1m30s) personal introduction and a discussion
+of which element of WOVEN I expect to struggle most with in this course.
+I expect to struggle with visual communication more than the other
+forms, which will manifest in several places but will probably have the
+most significant effects on videos or the blog design.
+This video also includes how I plan to develop my skills with this
+modality (I plan to focus on design and aesthetics of presentation).</p>
+<h3>First-Week Video</h3>
+<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/450699415"
+allowfullscreen="" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0"></iframe>
+<h3>First-Week Video Script</h3>
+<iframe width=600 height=400
+src="https://git.hrhr.dev/school20/plain/markley/03_first_week_video">
+</iframe>
+<dl>
+ <dt>Goals</dt>
+ <dd>Through this assignment, I familiarized myself with the
+ WOVEN elements and set a goal for self-improvement throughout
+ the course.
+ I also worked on video production and presentation, to practice
+ some of these elements.
+ I expect to target this in assignments throughout the course.
+ I also better understand the value of targeting multiple types
+ of communication for rhetoric and in different works.
+ This assignment was also directed towards the course material,
+ and I better understand the assignments that we will be doing
+ throughout the course (like the reading journal or final video
+ project) because I will probably want to put extra effort into
+ using the visual and design aspect of my content effectively.
+ The reading journal, especially, will benefit from extra design
+ work.</dd>
+ <dt>Purpose/Prompt</dt>
+ <dd>This video includes a short introduction to me, including my
+ name, "major," and hometown and the theme of this course (health
+ as a social construct) and the teacher (Dr. Markley).
+ The First-Week Video asks about a potential struggle with WOVEN
+ based on previous experience with trying to communicate in the
+ medium.
+ In addition to previous experience with the medium, the
+ assignment asked me to develop a goal and a way to reach that
+ goal based on that previous experience.
+ I did this by talking about a focus on revision and the specific
+ component of graphic design, but I didn't match these with
+ previous experience.
+ I could have talked about better, simpler presentations I've
+ made on topics I've known more about, where I can tell most of
+ the story and the graphics were improved through a couple of
+ rounds of revision, based on the content.</dd>
+ <dt>Audience</dt>
+ <dd>The audience is faculty members and other first-year
+ students who are familiar with WOVEN, this assignment, and the
+ objectives of the course in general, like rhetoric.
+ Because of this familiarity with the objective, I explicitly
+ connected the visual mode to my difficulty with speaking
+ briefly, but I tried not to overexplain the mode or visual
+ design.
+ However, I did give my personal experience of how the need for
+ brevity and dense language collide.
+ PowerPoints and posters are my most common interactions with the
+ visual mode, and my audience should be familiar with both.
+ However, I barely included one anecdotal example under the time
+ constraints, possibly because I explained too abstractly: I
+ could have talked about a revision or the impact of a poor
+ design and better shown my point about brevity and still had
+ time to talk about the digital reading journal.
+ </dd>
+ <dt>Design for Medium</dt>
+ <dd>Because this is a video, I focused on engagement.
+ For content, I wrote out a script that I would read, rehearse,
+ and edit down into.
+ I used a high-jumpcut vlog style to make the video seem more
+ energetic, and I tried to keep my voice upbeat because my voice
+ is the primary content in this style.
+ I chose not to use another production style like a time-lapse or
+ slideshow because I think my image and a direct explanation of
+ my ideas is important and best delivered talking straight to the
+ camera.
+ I included music (the instrumental of White Town's Your Woman)
+ because I think that it better covers up breaks in talking and
+ maintains a central element throughout the video.
+ I did try to keep it quiet relative to me talking because the
+ music itself is unimportant.</dd>
+ <dt>Revision</dt><!--The most important question-->
+ <dd>Another type of video may have fit my argument better, but
+ given the style I chose, the video could have been improved on
+ the script and on the presentation.
+ The script could have been much more personal by extending the
+ anecdote and possibly including a visual representation for the
+ product I created.
+ I also probably should have chosen music not under copyright,
+ and possibly faded it out at the beginning and in at the end.
+ For the final product, cutting away to an image might have made
+ it more engaging.
+ The way I filmed it could also be improved: I held the camera,
+ so it shook a bit, and I read the script for part of the video.
+ If I had mostly memorized the script and propped up the camera
+ to get a single shot between cuts and to stabilize it, the video
+ would probably feel higher quality.
+ </dd>
+</dl>