aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html')
-rw-r--r--markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html158
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html b/markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..94734d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/markley/portfolio/05_medical_object_video.html
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+<!--Title: Medical Object Video-->
+<h1>Introduction</h1>
+<p>
+The Final Video Project for this English 1102 course was about a
+"Medical Object."
+In each of the texts we studied this semester, there were several
+examples of medical objects that either had big impacts or were shaped
+by their cultural and historical contexts, and therefore are a lens into
+a larger social issue (similar to the concept of health).
+This video was about finding a medical object and digging into its
+historical context within the framework of health and social ideals.
+I chose to talk about healthcare and how politics has interacted with it
+by investigating a specific drug called insulin glargine/Lantus.
+</p><p>
+This assignment was structured as the final medical object video
+artifact and three preceding process documents.
+The process documents are a proposal, an annotated bibliography, and a
+script.
+</p>
+
+<h2>The Medical Object Video</h2>
+<iframe src="https://player.vimeo.com/video/483001196" width="640"
+height="360" frameborder="0" allow="autoplay; fullscreen"
+allowfullscreen></iframe>
+<h3>The Project Proposal</h3>
+<p>The Project Proposal </p>
+<iframe src="https://hrhr.dev/markley/proposal" style="width: 60%;
+height: 60vh; min-width: 600px; min-height: 400px;"></iframe>
+<h3>The Annotated Bibliography</h3>
+<p>This document came after the project proposal sequentially.
+It is a small subset of the citations I could have used from my
+research, and it includes some analysis of each source that was useful
+in developing my script.</p>
+<iframe src="https://hrhr.dev/markley/biblio" style="width: 60%;
+height: 60vh; min-width: 600px; min-height: 400px;"></iframe>
+<h3>The Medical Object Video Script</h3>
+<p>This supports the medical object video, and I read off of this for
+part of the video, but I changed some words slightly version because I
+didn't like how part of the script ended up sounding.</p>
+<iframe src="https://git.hrhr.dev/school20/plain/markley/21_script"
+width=600 height=400></iframe>
+
+<dl>
+ <dt>Goals</dt>
+ <dd>Recursive writing was a big part of creating this artifact;
+ the four layers in the process documents achieves the
+ <a
+ href="https://sites.gatech.edu/wcppolicies/engl-1101-and-1102-common-policies-fall-2020">Process
+ Outcome</a> with repeated editing of similar ideas and an
+ incorporation of research into the process rather than something
+ occurring before the formal process.
+ The Project Proposal includes a segment about what research
+ needs to be done for the annotated bibliography and the script,
+ which is putting in writing the process of discovery and of
+ analysis.
+ The assignment asks us to write out this proposal and then the
+ annotated bibliography because it requires us to focus on
+ research and a filming/design plan.
+ This focus means that the final product will probably have
+ better-filmed and -researched content.
+ <!--Often, without a process in place to develop these specific
+ pieces, I end up with less developed versions because I'm
+ focused on writing the script and then looking for articles or
+ research to support my ideas, which is a poor investigative
+ method. -->
+ This is a synthesis piece, and the research is meant to be very
+ broad, so I observed several different disciplines and genres,
+ and the medical studies varied significantly from summary
+ histories and newspaper articles.
+ I was able to use these different accounts, which were all
+ biased towards reporting different parts (medical histories
+ preferred medical breakthroughs, newspaper articles preferred
+ sensational statistics) to build a cohesive narrative around
+ insulin glargine.
+ </dd>
+ <dt>Audience</dt>
+ <dd>The audience is the general public, including my peers at
+ Georgia Tech.
+ This means that I'm not talking to an expert audience and can
+ assume very little knowledge about my topic like I would on an
+ essay about a book, so I need to explain a lot of the topic.
+ Most of the video is just this, me explaining the eventual
+ development that led up to genetically modified human insulin,
+ but I do have a "take."
+ This bias is deliberately embedded into the storytelling and
+ it's why I talk about patents so much even when I'm mostly
+ describing the technology's development.
+ Furthermore, this means that the product should be engaging.
+ A general audience isn't going to sit through a boring technical
+ summary like a niche audience might (although it should still be
+ avoided), and I tried to achieve this with my nonverbal tone and
+ body language.
+ Editing made sure that my speaking was decent and that picture
+ asides broke up more monotonous bits.</dd>
+ <dt>Purpose/Prompt</dt>
+ <dd>The final project asks students to create a 5-minute video
+ (I created a 7-minute video with a 1 minute end card) that
+ explains a medical object we haven't discussed in class.
+ "Object" is a really broad category, including procedures,
+ techniques, devices, medicines, models, or breakthroughs as long
+ as they are medical.
+ Originally, I was going to talk about some medical device
+ because there is a lot of injustice perpetrated by companies on
+ medical devices and information security, but I learned that the
+ FDA has allowed researchers to test implants with DRM for
+ security, which weakened my case.
+ However, I still wanted to talk about exploitation, which
+ brought me to insulin, "the poster child for [over-priced
+ healthcare]."
+ I chose to work on this project alone, and created a product
+ that explains what insulin glargine is (I used historical
+ context to do this), how it works, how it is used, when and how
+ it was invented, and the significant contexts that led to its
+ development and its current form (in insulin's case, patents and
+ massive conglomerate mergers).</dd>
+ <dt>Design for Medium</dt>
+ <dd>I used the video medium as an extension of a presentation
+ where things can be performed multiple times and modified after
+ their performance.
+ I "performed" the script in more of a news-show style than the
+ video-essay type I was looking for, but this is still a common
+ trope within the medium, so audiences are comfortable with this
+ sort of presentation.
+ I also used a couple of video essay tropes like section breaks
+ and overlain photos because I want there to be a sense of
+ consistent chronology even if I jump around some due to some
+ changes happening around the same time or being larger trends of
+ years or decades.
+ I don't have any self-made visual content, so the principles of
+ design (the symmetry, alignment kinds) are less applicable, but
+ I did choose my background to be mostly symmetric and well-lit
+ and I chose the titles based on the repetition principle.
+ I reused the wall color and the door color (lightened and
+ darkened, respectively, for readability) in the title to keep
+ color consistency.
+ </dd>
+ <dt>Revision</dt>
+ <dd>On this video, the supporting documents were fairly
+ complete, so the content and citations (when used) were relevant
+ and fairly high-quality.
+ One thing I would have prefered to do with the script or the
+ annotated bibliography is to integrate health more explicitly.
+ I believe that, implicitly, medicine, underuse, and social
+ conditions have a lot to do fundamentally with health, but I
+ believe I didn't sufficiently explore how the norms we have
+ interact with social ideals and society (like the poor).
+ For the video, I didn't leave myself as much time as I would
+ have liked to edit it, and I don't think that it is as appealing
+ as it could be.
+ The solid-color titles are somewhat bland, and even though
+ they're sufficient, a redesign could be nicer looking.
+ Images were also somewhat hastened.
+ I didn't exactly establish a style for image placement, which
+ could have hurt their inclusion, and the images that I included
+ weren't particularly deliberate; most were to break up the
+ monotony of me talking, which is valuable, but I feel that had I
+ searched harder, I may have found a more valuable image set.</dd>
+</dl>