aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/stanzione/mm3.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'stanzione/mm3.tex')
-rw-r--r--stanzione/mm3.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/stanzione/mm3.tex b/stanzione/mm3.tex
index 733e178..fceb7d9 100644
--- a/stanzione/mm3.tex
+++ b/stanzione/mm3.tex
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Your friend gets a rude and distant experimenter, and they also eat
three grasshoppers.
A lot of people expect that after this experiment, you would like the
grasshoppers more than your friend, but we actually see the opposite
-effect \autocite[433]{textbook}!
+effect \autocite{textbook}!
You have the explanation ``I did it to please the nice experimenter''
for why you ate the grasshoppers.
But your friend has to rationalize why they ate the grasshoppers, so
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ they are more likely to rationalize that they liked the taste.
This affect is called an ``attitude,'' a composite of the actions,
feelings, and ideas you have on a topic, and cognitive dissonance
usually brings these components into line with each other
-\autocite[431]{textbook}.
+\autocite{textbook}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}