diff options
| author | Holden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev> | 2020-01-26 11:31:22 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Holden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev> | 2020-01-26 11:31:22 -0500 |
| commit | 1206f2a2252841fae2a6f3d991c26df9117d0399 (patch) | |
| tree | 0590a7352dbc613ecf314d5c6bd1616dbd12a371 /poster | |
| parent | b6b9a29f138e42dcea7c7618c366232a7e6f31a4 (diff) | |
symlinked a bunch of stuff
Diffstat (limited to 'poster')
| -rw-r--r-- | poster/analysis.tex | 3 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | poster/document.tex | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | poster/research.tex (renamed from poster/background.tex) | 0 |
3 files changed, 3 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/poster/analysis.tex b/poster/analysis.tex index db0ee02..8c3e55a 100644 --- a/poster/analysis.tex +++ b/poster/analysis.tex @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ -\spacing=110 The patterns created by antlion groups are emergent: they don't exhibit top-down structure like a highly regular tiled or even consistent polymorphism across trials. -However, the antlions (myrmeleon immaculatus) did cluster somewhat (remaining close to each other despite available space, in some cases) but regardless maintained sufficient area to capture food, either of the cannibalistic or regular sort. +However, the antlions (Myrmeleon immaculatus) did cluster somewhat (remaining close to each other despite available space, in some cases) but regardless maintained sufficient area to capture food, either of the cannibalistic or regular sort. These patterns likely developed, at least in the short terms these antlions were studied, by slow movement of the pits across the trial area, either by live migration or abandonment of old pits (which often occurred). The Voronoi diagrams are the primary source which exhibits these traits: scaled down to the window of the trial area which antlions populated, the area claimed by each individual antlion is somewhat consistent, explicable by a selfish algorithm: each antlion wants to optimize its area of ant capture (represented by ``claimed'' regions on the Voronoi diagrams), so the area was shared about equally by the group. Also, average distance to nearest neighbor decreased with lesser trial area: from 5--6cm on average in the 33x32cm trial down to 3--3.5cm in the 8x7cm trial, the graph in Figure 3 demonstrates a clear correlation, with a notable (but inconclusive) p-value of about 8\%, between territorial area and total area. diff --git a/poster/document.tex b/poster/document.tex index 2ad2f6d..125b13d 100644 --- a/poster/document.tex +++ b/poster/document.tex @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ \input imagesone - \include Background Information;background + \include Background Information;research \input imagestwo }\hfil\colo{ @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ \include Experiment Notes;notes }\hfil\colo{ - \include Data Analysis;analysis + \spacing=110\include Data Analysis;analysis \input imagesfive diff --git a/poster/background.tex b/poster/research.tex index aedb5ef..aedb5ef 100644 --- a/poster/background.tex +++ b/poster/research.tex |