aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex')
-rw-r--r--jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
index 56f0048..0253930 100644
--- a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
+++ b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-\input mla8.tex
%must be run from root directory
\input mla8.tex
@@ -51,7 +50,9 @@ And this method works, focusing on personal style instead of on hiding behind a
%clutter
All of these issues can be reduced to the one atom of writing: problems. Writing is an analytical process, so the easiest and best way to fit it into my cognition is to recognize it as what it is: a big problem that can be broken down into smaller problems. This also allows active learning to be recognized as practice. ``Whatever it is, it has to be confronted and solved'' \zincite{49}. But therein lies the utility of recognizing problems. %does this fit my style?
-They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself.
+They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself. %conclusion doesn't leave people thinking
+%Problems. Maybe this can become a body paragraph, or put this theme more into other paragraphs?
+
%Make statements of qualities clearer
\biblio