aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rich/34_parties
blob: ba3fd19e2a6f4fe3d55ed54aedefa7f5c5088893 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
Political Parties in the US
- The electorate is divided by ideology, demographics, and "Rep-Ind-Dem"
    - Polarized more, especially in the past four years
The gov reflects this
- "Divided Government": different parties control House, Senate, Pres.
    - possibly governors' differences
    - Streamlining of government isn't voted for.

What is a political party, in general?
- A group of activists who organize to win elections, operate the
  government, and determine public policy
- Controlling the government requires a broad band of beliefs
    - Can't be narrowly focused like a special interest group

All political parties:
1) Recruit Candidates
2) Organizing and running elections
- Funding
3) Presenting alternative policies
Only major parties (Dem and Rep, in US):
4) Operate Government
5) Organize Opposition
- Sometimes minor parties get governance in states

Are parties still doing this effectively?
- Morris Fiorina sees a "decline in all duties and accountability." Why?
    - Party Organization used to shape almost all political behavior
        - Now, the Dem establishment (ex.) doesn't control their nominee
        - Public spending limits mean campaigns don't need to rely on
          parties
    - Party in the Electorate
        - Candidates essentially run independent campaigns
        - They break from party platforms to serve local districts
            - Or focus differently, like fiscal conservatism vs family
              values.
    - Party in Government
        - Increased party fragmentation
        - Personal and local influence
        - Recently, politicians vote on party lines, but not too long
          ago, bipartisanship was a real option
    - The rise of Single Issue Groups
        - Parties are more beholden to Interests

All parties can be broken down into three components:
1) Electorate
    - Core groups (base)
        - Essentially a guaranteed vote, so turnout is the main focus in
          these demographics
        - Campaigning to the other party's core groups is mostly
          unnecessary
    - Independents
        - Ex: women voters
        - Campaigning on women's issues can sway 4--9 pts in this group.
        - "Why elections are won or lost"
    - Loose affiliates (usually candidate-specific)
        - Difficult to campaign to or motivate these groups
        - Strategizing on these groups is hard
        - Ex: anti-Trump voters, Barack Obama voters.

2) Party Organization
    - Not organized hierarchically: national gov differs significantly
      from local gov and voters and the party orgs
    - It's more confederate: people organize loosely and give power to
      the party limitedly
    - National tends to be voters' focus (healthcare, nat. defense), but
      local, like potholes, schools have diff. policies than nat. Dems.
    - Party Presence is not a constant or constant polices
        - The party has the "umbrella" and its constituent parts are
          trying to fit into policy as they can, but not everything gets
          through.
        - Ex: high-income + low-education in Republican party

3) Party in government; crosses over with organization
    - Majority does not ensure power, especially not absolute power.
    - Supermajorities with united gov (pres, house, senate) is the only
      thing that gives one party the power.
    - Ticket splitting: vote for Biden but David Perdue.
        - Because of weaker parties

Two Major Parties
- Unlike most countries, broad bases with poor assurances for the
  parties
- The Democratic Party
    - Minorities
    - Labor
    - Women
- The Republican Party
    - High Income
        - College graduates (changing?)
    - Business
    - Religion? (depends)
        - Religiosity, evangelicals like Reps
Why has the system endured?
    - US Exceptionalism and Institutions
    - For only 28 years did the US not have a two-party system
    1. Duality (US exceptionalism)
        - Pro-choice or pro-life
        - Pro-gun or pro-gun control
    2. Political socialization
        - "Two is all you need"
        - Issues are presented as two choices rather than nuanced
          problems
    3. Political culture
        - Three distinct political cultures
        - The cultures lean in one direction or another.
        - Can be handled by two parties
    4. State and Federal Laws
        - Written by the two parties
        - Handle more than 2 parties poorly
    5. Winner-take-all electoral system
        - Duverger's law: how many winners? One -> two parties
        - District design, and even local elections have one winner per
          district
Role of minor parties in the US?
    - Most countries' minor parties caucus with other parties.
    - They do *ocassionally* have an impact
    - 1992 Perot - 19% of popular vote but 0 electoral votes. Cost HW
      Bush the election. 1996 8.5%
        - Clinton was elected, setting the stage for Obama
    - Don't need a large % to make a difference. See 2016
    - Historically important 3rd parties
        - Communist (Dem)
        - Green (Dem)
        - Bull-Moose Progressives (Rep)
        - Reform Party (mix of both)