aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHolden Rohrer <hdawg7797@yahoo.com>2019-08-12 01:40:04 -0400
committerHolden Rohrer <hdawg7797@yahoo.com>2019-08-12 01:40:04 -0400
commit26391848f945173b6fc07c7b7c78a6a2788438e4 (patch)
tree5625bf0df45acf4f0122b24325753ba307eedb5d
parent90c4bf5dc7369c0afd0551af7400975584b062e9 (diff)
essay edits
-rw-r--r--jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex4
-rw-r--r--jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex5
2 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
index 7dc6a67..0253930 100644
--- a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
+++ b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.rough.tex
@@ -50,7 +50,9 @@ And this method works, focusing on personal style instead of on hiding behind a
%clutter
All of these issues can be reduced to the one atom of writing: problems. Writing is an analytical process, so the easiest and best way to fit it into my cognition is to recognize it as what it is: a big problem that can be broken down into smaller problems. This also allows active learning to be recognized as practice. ``Whatever it is, it has to be confronted and solved'' \zincite{49}. But therein lies the utility of recognizing problems. %does this fit my style?
-They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself.
+They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself. %conclusion doesn't leave people thinking
+%Problems. Maybe this can become a body paragraph, or put this theme more into other paragraphs?
+
%Make statements of qualities clearer
\biblio
diff --git a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
index 56f0048..0253930 100644
--- a/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
+++ b/jones-la/zinsser-essay.tex
@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
-\input mla8.tex
%must be run from root directory
\input mla8.tex
@@ -51,7 +50,9 @@ And this method works, focusing on personal style instead of on hiding behind a
%clutter
All of these issues can be reduced to the one atom of writing: problems. Writing is an analytical process, so the easiest and best way to fit it into my cognition is to recognize it as what it is: a big problem that can be broken down into smaller problems. This also allows active learning to be recognized as practice. ``Whatever it is, it has to be confronted and solved'' \zincite{49}. But therein lies the utility of recognizing problems. %does this fit my style?
-They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself.
+They can be solved, and solutions can be learned in two ways: reading other people's good writing, and writing well myself. %conclusion doesn't leave people thinking
+%Problems. Maybe this can become a body paragraph, or put this theme more into other paragraphs?
+
%Make statements of qualities clearer
\biblio