aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/rich
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHolden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev>2020-11-18 16:01:25 -0500
committerHolden Rohrer <hr@hrhr.dev>2020-11-18 16:01:37 -0500
commit67f74646b43bf181d10b6d4fdbc9e3721a611dd9 (patch)
treefb22ac80b70c7cb1e67d0c87f6790a7490de4ced /rich
parent5b30719af9c2eb9afbc8d23a763856f7560db196 (diff)
my opinion on interest groups
Diffstat (limited to 'rich')
-rw-r--r--rich/33_discuss15
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rich/33_discuss b/rich/33_discuss
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52566a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rich/33_discuss
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+After listening to lecture, do you believe interest groups are dangerous
+or are they a productive part of the political process in United States?
+
+Interest groups are value-neutral: they are just a way of organizing
+individuals into "factions."
+An environmentalist voter holds a proportional amount of power if they
+donate to political candidates and advocate independently or organize
+with a group.
+The same holds for businesses, farmers, and pro-gun voters.
+However, they are dangerous and though they can't be limited explicitly,
+the government needs to manage the power their constituent groups hold.
+If businesses are consistently pushing for anti-labor policy, the
+government needs to limit the power of businesses.
+Their interest groups should still be maintained as a useful touchpoint
+for the government.